FraPre
About
- Username
- FraPre
- Joined
- Visits
- 4,721
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Good morning Günter, i cut out such pictures in every situation and at any place with the Snipping Tool and save them as a picture. You add this via "Attach image" in the toolbar above the writing field of your new post here in the forum. For me w…
-
-
Hello Günter, a DME ARC is an integral part of a programmed procedure (SID STAR) and is not entered by the pilot into the FMS. ATC will not tell you to spontaneously fly a DME ARC. If this should nevertheless be provided, one would have to fly this …
-
Hello Günter, you can only mark waypoints outside of SID and STAR with OVERFLY. The navigation points within SID and STAR have predefined restrictions (Speed, Altitude, OVERFLY) and can not be changed, at least with respect to the OVERFLY determinat…
-
Hi, a autothrottle does not exist, so you have to control the whole thing manually and adjust. In cruising speed is accelerated to the desired speed and then just pulled back the power lever until the planned speed (e.g., Vmo -10 Kts) is maintai…
-
On the INT page, the input field is only for inputting the position number of the displayed waypoints, same as before when entering / selecting airways, Rwy or Approach methods. If you want to enter a DCT with the flight plan input, you can do this …
-
You mean a synchronous, automatic data transfer as with Boeing or Airbus? But that would not be real, because it is real, as it is simulated here!
-
Hi, the Dash Editor simply calculates the CG location automatically based on the inputs you need to make manually for both the Paxe and the Load. PFPX sets the values for the load automatically according to the area code. Since I calculate in P…
-
Hi Guenther, you can not compare the FMS of the Dash with those of the Boeing or Airbus. The FMS of the Dash is already implemented quite extensively and offers mainly the functions as they are there in real life. There are also missing little th…
-
Thanks
-
You should even take pictures, because without you can always suspect. There are various conditions for switching on the autopilot, which you have to check.
-
@FraPre said: Clickable? Do you have the appropriate display in the MCP and in the PFD after connecting the AP? If you fly in HDG mode and activate these modes, do you have the display HDG SEL as Flight Mode? In my example picture I had the ar…
-
Clickable? Do you have the appropriate display in the MCP and in the PFD after connecting the AP? If you fly in HDG mode and activate these modes, do you have the display HDG SEL as Flight Mode? In my example picture I had the areas circled times?
-
Hello, but the autopilot can be switched on but does not react? A few pictures are always helpful. Overview glareshield, overhead and pedestal
-
The PM would then anyway not been helpful, or would have been incomprehensible, because I thought of the name Rolf Germany or Austria. In that case we would have been able to make a call on the phone. But my Finnish skills are = 0. So if there …
-
Hi Rolf, you´ve read my PM? First, the weights from the majestics for DOM, MZFW, MTOW, MLW, max Cargo/Baggage and Fuel are given! You can see these maximums on the Majestics loading tool. You must also take these values in PFPX, for each air…
-
-
Of course, you also need to match all the base weights between the Majestics Editor and PFPX, with the editor's weights and, of course, the Majestic Dash's dominating. In the picture you can see my settings for the Dash in PFPX. The maximum values …
-
Hello Rolf, the problem is that some aircraft can not take advantage of the possibilities offered by PFPX. Thus, the Majestics Dash counts only with a weight, whether man, woman or child. You can not find a separation in the Majestics Load Editor…
-
That the Dash as a propeller machine pulls to the left or turns, is still normal, since both propellers turn in the same direction. Adjust it to the ground on the ground before starting by a corresponding rudder trim to the right. In cruising respec…
-
Good, then that will probably be so.
-
I read that differently in the FCTM. Where exactly did you read this?
-
Yes, in this case you descend with an conventional vertical mode, at the Dash VS
-
I did not change anything in the routings. In the first flight I flew completely according to the specifications in the charts, ie the STAR and the approach from POGUX. With the 90 ° turn at UPOSA, the Dash had their problem, which caused the VNAV t…
-
So, the flight and the VNAV flown approach to ENFL went quite well. After the published routes flown (STAR and Approach Transition) she had problems with the 90 ° turn, whereby the FMS captured the VNAV Path later and indicated as planned, but had…
-
So I do not really see any really serious mistakes, and from the final approach VNAV works for me, too, if the requirements are met. The only difference is that the vertical path is miscalculated since it starts with the Rwy height but should actual…
-
What does not mean useful? It should be part of the approach briefing to determine how to fly the approach, with which modes. When I see on the APPR plan page that an approach flown with VNAV is not possible, whether intentionally or through an erro…
-
FPL/MENÜ/NEXT
-
Whether the approach can be flown using VNAV can be seen on the Approach Plan in the FMS. There you can see the structure of the approach and with the Dash at least the course and the heights. Really the distance and the glideslope angle could be s…
-
Thanks, I have all the documentation, the problem is that the Majestics does not work the way I read it out. The corresponding procedure is described in the manual for the FMS. I had hoped in this regard, more information from the Airline2Sim video…