ARM approach

2»

Comments

  • But you programmed VNAV separately and indicated the Rwy (244 ft) as a reference waypoint, right? The TOD that can be seen indicates this.

  • No I did VTO to PIKVO

  • Is it possible for you to do a video how you do ?
  • Have I never done what program do you do it with?

  • Geforce experience
  • edited February 2021
    I just try again with full landing conf and it s ok.
    thank you.

    question from how many NM of IKDEB i must to begin get down flaps and gear down ?
  • question from how many NM of IKDEB i must to begin get down flaps and gear down ?

    The enclosed is for NPA, usually NDB but it would give you a good idea how to work flaps and gear.

  • Why i's not same thing for npa and ils about begin landing conf ?
  • Why as well arm app in nav page not arm itself?
    Supposed arm itself from 30 nm of the airport.

    Each time I must to arm myself.
  • @helico55 said:

    Each time I must to arm myself.

    And where is the problem? You do other things too, if you arm the approach as described in detail in this thread.

    Rgds
    Reinhard

  • Problem.i don't understand why not arm itself and many other post say supposed arm itself.
  • edited February 2021

    It says so in the documents and I've seen it that way. I myself always control it manually, including the activation of the approach, since I fly a lot with vectors to the final anyway. In your case I made a quick flight from CYRQ to CYQB today. I could understand the shortcomings with the interrupted VNAV Descend to BIVTI, we have now mentioned the reasons several times. The final approach also worked, but what I didn't like was the fluctuating VS due to the additional waypoint KISIK despite the stabilized approach. The GPA is given as 3.10 °, but I noticed that ULBOM, unlike in the charts with 2700 ft, is behind in the dash, in the charts with 2500 ft. In addition, a GPA of 2.09° is on the NAV page visible between IKDEB and ULMOB, from TOD to ULMOB 5.94° although from 4.5 NM in front of ULMOB there is a 3.10° GPA planned. Obviously, this point does not play a role, nor is it stored as a navigation point in the approach plan. The VNAV Descend seems to be based on the programming of the VNAV Page. For me it was a VS of -1700 ft from TOD in the direction of ULMOB. Only from ULMOB, although it happened 200 ft too high, the VS then more suited to a 3.10 ° GPA

Sign In or Register to comment.