niksan29
About
- Username
- niksan29
- Joined
- Visits
- 442
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
> @aua668 said: > To start to count with zero is the more logical way in terms of programming. Maybe the sim is not following the standard we play the simulator and do not do programming, besides the simulator was created before sim v…
-
> @aua668 said: > Hi, > > The documentation "SpecialFeatures.pdf" page 4 is very clear but why not come to one standard? for example, how is it done in the sim settings?
-
> @aua668 said: > It depends, how you count. of course you can count in different ways, but why not come to one standard? for example, how is it done in the sim settings obviously It's not so complicated...
-
> @jpgmultimodal said: > The FMC will show you 124 Ft for Rwy 28 and Rwy 10 as well. > I am not sure but I think Prepar 3dv5 would give you real Rwy altitudes. If somebody could comment on that ? > Regards, > JP yes, …
-
> @Exelta said: > I confirm, I have the same offset. and there are two of us
-
@Jetairfly1 @FraPre I don't see the picture, could you upload it to another resource?
-
@Jetairfly1 Hey! your screenshot is unfortunately not available... @FraPre I didn't quite understand, we talked about +50 which are not added to threshold crossing height the current version Dash, although they should.
-
@Jetairfly1 Thank you for answering, I just want to clarify: the navigraph for sim does not indicate altitude at WI103 point (the same in real data) this is also confirmed by the charts... the altitude at this point should be calculated by …
-
@FraPre @kroswynd yes, it really looks like a steep approach is just: Granted the system on the outside based on the manual states what it does which is simply disabling certain functions of the EGPWS. @kroswynd and hopefully…
-
@FraPre only one button is the same for A318, I wonder what processes occur after pressing and what physical effect we get
-
Hi gentlemes! in my opinion: a percentage of what not allowed, we cannot perform includes all the same: 1)a VNAV-guided descent, a navigation point with a defined altitude restriction is followed by one or more waypoints that have no res…
-
@FraPre let me know, what's included in the 1% exception(in your opinion a couple of examples plz)?
-
In any case, this will be doubtful, since we do not have official information regarding the real Dash... I don't know why we have different data, but my Aerosoft and PMDG add 50 feet(in fplan mcdu/fmc) to crossing the threshold P.S ILS…
-
> @FraPre said: > The problem generally occurs when, in a VNAV-guided descent, a navigation point with a defined altitude restriction is followed by one or more waypoints that have no restriction. at the moment I am most worried about …
-
> @FraPre said: > I fly RNAV GNSS approaches with an RNP of 0.30. I won't fly an RNAV (RNP) like in your case LOWI with it. --- but Innsbruck also requires 0.30... and tell me what differences do you see?(between RNAV GNSS approaches w…
-
> @jpgmultimodal said: > You are right but as it is only on few airports that we would need RNP AR APCH so it is quite allright. --- not only, also we cannot perform many RNAV app with VNAV minimum > Most of the Q400 operator…
-
> @jpgmultimodal said: > I am just thinking of maybe another way of doing these approaches: > When you are starting your final descent OMUBO (for NZQN) angle 3°20 or WI750 (for LOWI) angle 3°60 is there a special option in some FMS …
-
> @kroswynd said: > Please also bear in mind that although in the STAR procedures our FMS is missing the intermediate calculation of the altitudes, it will not do so in the approaches as it is simply not safe. If Navigraph does not specify…
-
and here, you are right! by the way, it is very disappointing that there is no approval of a steep approach, even A318 from asoft has this
-
Hi JP! yes it really was so long ago and yes, at the moment we cannot correctly execute almost all schemes with a minimum at LNAV\VNAV as comrade > @kroswynd said: The FMS is not perfect and still as some flaws. We'll have to hav…
-
as noted, this problem already been discussed earlier, one example: http://majesticsoftware.com/forums/discussion/511/rnav-incorrect-logic-or-airac-1908-broken#latest in short, no solution was found and we cannot perform precise landing pr…
-
of course, take a screenshot of the file (only where you made the changes)
-
@kroswynd said: Majestic does not seek devices and assign buttons Then I wonder why this is happening: in mjc84.ini i set J0_b2=AFCS_->inputs.TCS_button but when we press the real 2 button of the doystick we don't get TCS... we o…
-
You will find the main points in this topic: http://majesticsoftware.com/forums/discussion/comment/3547#Comment_3547
-
why majestic is incorrectly define button numbering, any ideas? how can I guess so that the real button two is the same for majestic ?
-
After several tests, I figured out what the problem is the button numbers assigned in the mjc84.ini:differ from the real ones on the joystick and sim key assignmets too, eg: J0_b2=AFCS_->inputs.TCS_button real ones on the joystick and sim ke…
-
@kroswynd in sim for this joystick button only trim dn: the same button in mjc84.ini: J0_b2=AFCS_->inputs.TCS_button how do i set another joystick button for TCS?
-
I don’t press the TCS button, I don’t know which key controls it ... I just press the trimmer up or down on the joystick and see the indication TCS. I just want to know is this correct logic? and also what is the default TCS button?
-
@jpgmultimodal this is the only( at least on this forum) and very useful information from a real SOP Flybe, it will be useful for many;) I've been using this for a long time (the only thing I could find), and you are probably the first one to s…
-
my personal recommendation is to use this FREE tool better: http://majesticsoftware.com/forums/discussion/894/standalone-v-speed-calculator-and-setter-xml-gauge#latest