-
Hold pattern
by FraPre ·you can decide for yourself. There are actually 3 options, which the Dash also displays accordingly. -
Approach problem
by helico55 ·why on the picture is supposed to have 3.00 descent and it descent at 5.03 ? -
Approach problem
by helico55 · -
ARM approach
by FraPre ·the stabilized approach. The GPA is given as 3.10 °, but I noticed that ULBOM, unlike in the charts with 2700 ft, is behind in the dash, in the charts with 2500 ft. In addition, a GPA of 2.09° is on -
ARM approach
by helico55 ·Supposed arm itself from 30 nm of the airport. -
ARM approach
by FraPre ·To get back to your video, the 3.10 ° path is indeed captured at around 4.5 NM, although the VNAV of the Dash here is definitely based exclusively on the ULBOM waypoint at 2500 ft, which is reached re -
ARM approach
by helico55 · -
ARM approach
by helico55 ·I must to descent 2300 feet min . -
ARM approach
by FraPre ·I didn't have time to watch the whole 30 minutes (which is always quite long) in detail. Unfortunately, it's bedtime again here. I noticed the two points in the fast forward run. -
P3D 64bit and 32 bit FSX Shared Cockpit Compatibility
by cloudycherno ·Hi, I have installed a brand new Q400 copy for 64 bit P3D v4.5 (newest version) and wanted to fly with my friend on 32 bit FSX(newest) version. Unfortuntaly the versions do not match when we connect - -
ARM approach
by FraPre ·After passing GONUM you activate VTO to pos. 3. Up to this moment it was PIKVO with a restriction of 5000 ft. After the overflight and at the moment of your ENTER, SAVIN changes to pos. 3, which has n -
ARM approach
by helico55 · -
Installs Exhausted
by Nezzie ·I recently purchased and installed the Majestic dash 8 for p3d v4 and v5. Subsequently, but not directly attributable to this software, my simulator experienced several ctd and I was obliged to uninst -
ARM approach
by jpgmultimodal ·As @FraPre said set the RNP to 0.30 instead of the 2.80. I am not sure if on our modelled Q400 it changes something but it is the procedure. -
takeoff flaps
by jpgmultimodal ·There are few hundred pages of tables regarding take off and landing distances which would take into account a lot of parameters that cannot be reproduced in FSX / P3D. Only the wind, altitude and wei -
ARM approach
by helico55 ·1:not set the RNP to 0.30, a DH (based on the radar altimeter) is only selected for ILS CAT II / III, here the DA would be 557 (based on barometric altitude) has been correct. The approach is based on -
ARM approach
by FraPre ·noticed, you have certainly not set the RNP to 0.30, a DH (based on the radar altimeter) is only selected for ILS CAT II / III, here the DA would be 557 (based on barometric altitude) has been correc -
SPAD.neXt, VRInsight Toggle&Tact panel and Majestic Dash
by csb005 ·I made as you wrote but no respose since 3 weeks... -
ARM approach
by FraPre ·you have flown correctly at 5000 ft, a VDEF of -734 ft is currently calculated, i.e. the aircraft thinks it is too high and disengages from VNAV. I am also assuming that the -1500 ft specification th -
ARM approach
by jpgmultimodal ·On your video we can see that you have a GS of about 340 Kt. We know that there are 26 Nm between GONUM and PIKVO and you have to loose 11000 Ft in about 4'30" which would give a VS of nearly 250