micstatic
About
- Username
- micstatic
- Joined
- Visits
- 538
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
I'm still having this issue. I've noticed that the mjc84.ini is being overwritten and when I scroll down to Joystick Interface Assignments the device numbers are changing. For example the correct: J1=X=FlightControls...Aileron is being replace…
-
the error was totally on my end. an old trim wheel hardware piece I had all of a sudden became added to the p3d axis controls. Clearing that out fixed the conflict. sorry for the fire drill
-
I think i figured it out. never mind. thanks
-
Would it be helpful if I send my INI file? thanks
-
Hey. Thanks for the reply. It's the tool that many here use. http://majesticsoftware.com/forums/discussion/36/125-hz-pro-controls-config-tool-wizard I'm absolutely positive I'm assigning the proper axis. Also I'm not sure how on some flights …
-
for those reading. There is another thread on avsim about this. Seems that the DLL's replace those in the enhancement package. So I'm wondering if the enhancement package can no longer be used in a windows 11 environment? I'm still going to atte…
-
@pa4tim said: I found the DLL file in the user section and that solved it do you mind sharing the solution so others with windows 11 can get it working? thanks
-
I feel like the text on the lower pedestal area is still somewhat blurry.
-
everything worked ok for me.
-
I'm going to try and get this and install in a couple hours. Will add my feedback here. So if this installs over the previous q400, I assume the 125hz controls in our INI files will stay in tact?
-
This is very very exciting. day 1 purchase. Will we need all new livery's?
-
I will have to test also. thanks
-
is your fix still holding? This would seem like an incredibly easy fix that seems to have stumped 42 for a longtime.
-
Yeah I would love to be able to use q400 immersion in V5. I know that 42 said they intended to try and fix it this year, but it was a loose commitment.
-
I also agree with this. I bought this plane but really didn't use it for a year or so. Learning curve is steep. But it's one of those planes that keeps me coming back now. I also would like to say thank you for developing such a fantastic airpla…
-
Bob. You make some good points, but I still find MSFS unflyable for a multitude of aspects. While it can be said that P3D somewhat has the fly on rails feel. MSFS is almost the opposite. Like it tries too hard to simulate "real life" physics to …
-
@q400sim said: @micstatic said: The other thing I forgot to mention that would be nice is a descent banana. would make planning manual descents a tad easier. But this is probably a somewhat major mod I never flew the…
-
The other thing I forgot to mention that would be nice is a descent banana. would make planning manual descents a tad easier. But this is probably a somewhat major mod
-
call me simple. But raindrops and a more HD like virtual cockpit is all I want. PBR exterior would just be an added benefit.
-
@plhought said: Would love to see like the images above - ACARs functionality with perf and other data implemented like the FSLabs stuff. Very realistic. Also printer implementation to print ACARs messages agree. With pushover sup…
-
Updated Virtual Cockpit panel textures. More sharp PBR Outside. More GSX Integration Windscreen water effects (But hopefully not using TrueGlass as it is unstable) Snow on outside of airplane. That's my vote
-
thanks. actually figured it out. all good now