Thanks for the P3D V5.x update. Discovered an issue when the GPU (ground power unit) is activated, the aircraft sinks into the tarmac. As soon as I deactivate the GPU, aircraft returns to normal gro

UDP interface not sending on the UDP interface 3. This fits to the observation of the developer of Aviserver, who analyzed the logfile. He told me, that nothing was sent during that phase. It's inter

* If you are trying to install a 32bit program into a 64 bit simulator, you could also have these issues. So you mentioned that you have upgraded the Q400:

Other test: the three lights of the GPWS Landing Flaps indicator (vars bc02, bc03 and bc04). For these, I never received any UDP packet...

I'm getting a repeatable crash right at liftoff when using FSPS' FFTF Dynamic utility (v5.1.12.26829) with the Q400 (1.021 x64 Pro) in P3D v5.1 HF1.

@FraPre only one button is the same for A318, I wonder what processes occur after pressing and what physical effect we get

3)RNP RNAV approach with a value less 0.30 RNP

Bought Pro version from Flightsimstore date 11/21/16. Well before they stopped paying suppliers. I had 64bit installed in Prepar 4.5.14..34698. Had to do a system refresh. Now the 64bit installer won’

To follow (more or less) the radar vector procedure, I would say around 20 Nm before FIDEK go to HDG mode 090°. Descend to 5000 Ft. When intercepting QDR 360° FLM, HDG 360° until you intercept lhe LOC

So with the equipment that we have with the Majestic Q400 if doing an ILS CAT II we could go down to 100 Ft, 200 Ft CAT I and LNAV-VNAV around 300 Ft (depending of the environment) which means that we

Dash, the PMDG Boeings and the FS Labs A320. So the 99% stands for every RNP RNAV approach up to 0.30 RNP, with less I would not be sure and would leave it, i.e. everything that is RNAV RNP AR. The M

I have to slow the plane down to a stop almost before the axis assigned as spoilers I use as the tiller can move the nose wheel. I tried different strategies... turn on nosewheel switch when below 40k

In the meantime, there is no reason to be putting FS2020 in the same category as P3D or even FSX for that matter and there is NO REASON for Majestic to even look at it, in my CONSIDERED opnion. So far

I had a fully configured and working P3D(4.5)/Q400.

7 Nm 2430' same as shown on the chart

5.3.2 Determination of the descent gradient for a non-precision approach with FAF

With the sim we have to take into account that (for FSX and P3dv4.5) it is only the Apt Elev that is taken into account, not the Rwy Elev.

Also.. those trim values seem excessive to me. I use 2-3 units of right rudder trim and that seems to work pretty well for me at all power settings.

Aerosoft A320